E’Twaun Moore entered the 2012 Orlando Summer League on the hot seat; there were plenty of questions swirling as to whether his non-guaranteed contract would be picked up by our Boston Celtics. And while we’ve still got a ways to go before that actually happens, it is looking more and more like it’s harder to ignore Moore. One half of the Purduo – JaJuan Johnson being the other – Moore has had a great week in Orlando, punctuated by an 18-point outburst on Friday (on 6-of-10 shooting), to go along with two assists and three steals in 21:53 of action.
The problem with Moore is that he’s solid but not spectacular. He simply goes about his business in workmanlike fashion; there’s nothing flashy, and nothing that really stands out about his game. And he’s received a constant stream of criticism about his ball handling skills. Moore is considered a point guard in this league, but he continues to take hits for his limitations at this position. None of this seems to phase the second year play-maker. And while he may not be flashy, he also doesn’t make the mistakes that usually go along with a more risky playing style.
From where I’m sitting, Danny Ainge will pick up that second year of Moore’s contract. But he’s the kind of player that I can also see Ainge packaging in a trade, either before the season in an effort to land Courtney Lee or O.J. Mayo, or before the trade deadline. I love Moore’s attitude and I appreciate his game, and I hope he stays in the fold, but I just can’t see it happening for long. A trade wouldn’t diminish Moore’s progress or tarnish his game. Moore has simply become hard to ignore, and it’s clear that he has the game to play in this league for a long time to come.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Boston, and all points beyond
-----------------------------------------------------
Phone: BR549
Email: contact.us@celtic-nation.com
Website: www.celtic-nation.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Moore is not an essential piece. Sans injuries, he is no higher than 3rd string at either PG or SG. But with Bradley out for the first month or two, he is thrust into a contributing role, not a big one, but a contributor none the less. The problem is that his 2nd year contract is the majority of a vet min and those are paid partially by the league. So the question may become does Moore provide enough development potential to outweigh Dooling (who at 32 may be willing to play for the minimum) who provides 3-ptrs, experience, and polish. Now I’m all about youth over end-of-the-run veteran role players, but the issue is how high of a ceiling does Moore have?